\n\n

Stuff You Should Know
The digital duo Josh and Chuck deconstruct your world.

Category RSS Feed

Podcast Transcript | Listen to the Podcast Now

Are there undiscovered people? | January 28, 2010

 
Announcer

Welcome to Stuff You Should Know from www.HowStuffWorks.com.

Josh Clark

Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I’m Josh Clark. With me, as always, is Charles W. Bryant.

Chuck Bryant

I’m always there for you, Josh.

Josh Clark

Yep. As always. How’s it going?

Chuck Bryant

I’m contractually obligated to be.

Josh Clark

I know. So, Chuck, you doing all right?

Chuck Bryant

Yeah. How are you?

Josh Clark

I’m doing pretty good.

Chuck Bryant

It’s Thursday. It’s not Friday.

Josh Clark

It’s a little gray out for my taste. It’s sprinkling out, by the way.

Chuck Bryant

I thought it was pouring rain.

Josh Clark

It’s sprinkling.

Chuck Bryant

That’s good.

Josh Clark

Chuck, do you remember back a year or so, May, 2008?

Chuck Bryant

How many years after “Ghostbusters”?

Josh Clark

What was it, ’84 or ’86?

Chuck Bryant

It was ’84, and yes, we do know a sequel is coming.

Josh Clark

It was 24 years. Yes. “Ghostbusters 3.” It’s going to be awesome. The entire original cast, except for Sigourney Weaver, which that’s okay. Yeah. “Ghostbusters 3″ coming out.

Chuck Bryant

So where are we?

Josh Clark

We’re 24 years after “Ghostbusters” in May, 2008. The news cycle had this kind of strange occurrence where a bunch of undiscovered human beings were splashed across the front pages of newspapers everywhere.

Chuck Bryant

Yeah. Sort of!

Josh Clark

There are several photos of people living in primitive huts, actually, primitive longhouses is what it looks like. It’s an aerial photo taken from a low-flying helicopter, and they are pissed. They’re aiming their bows and arrows at the camera.

Chuck Bryant

Did you see the picture? It’s pretty cool.

Josh Clark

Yeah. It’s awesome. They’re like, “Get out of here.” Yeah. This whole thing made the news cycle. Chuck, I take from what you said before we started recording that you have a tad bit of disdain for the journalism that was applied to this.

Chuck Bryant

Yeah. First of all, should we go ahead and refute it?

Josh Clark

Why not?

Chuck Bryant

Because they were not, in fact, undiscovered people.

Josh Clark

No. There’s actually a huge, huge distinction between undiscovered people and un-contacted or isolated people. Right?

Chuck Bryant

Right. But you would not know that by reading The Independent from London.

Josh Clark

Which I’m disappointed, because I like that paper. No, I’m sorry. I couldn’t care less about The Independent. It’s The Guardian I like.

Chuck Bryant

Yeah. You like The Guardian, not The Daily Mail, or The Independent.

Josh Clark

Right.

Chuck Bryant

Here’s how the article opens up. Beneath the picture of the clearly savage humans!

Josh Clark

Loincloths and everything.

Chuck Bryant

With the arrow pointing at the helicopter. “Three near-naked figures are visible in the forest clearing. Two of them are men, their bodies daubed with a red dye, and they are aiming their bows at the sky. A third figure appears to be a woman, her body blackened and only her pale hands and face betraying her natural color. This remarkable photograph is the first proof of the existence of one of the world’s last un-contacted tribes.” So they do say “un-contacted.”

Tags: , , , , ,

 
 

Comment Now

Recent Postings by Category