Posts Tagged: ‘neuroscience’

This is fairly unusual. A 13-year-old girl in Croatia fell into a coma for 24 hours and when she came to, she was able to speak fluent German. Only slightly dampening the mystery, she had begun to study the language in school, reports the Telegraph, but was by no means a fluent German speaker as she appears to be now.

Tags: , , ,

I might have to even trade out my current book for Cordelia Fine’s Delusions of Gender*, if only because it deals with something that Molly and I regularly run into while researching for Stuff Mom Never Told You. Since we spend so much time dissecting the wonderful and confusing differences between boys and girls, men and women, we probably have a lot of lessons to learn from Fine’s reexamination of the academic studies that we often pull from.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

The New York Times has an interesting piece about a group of scientists, most of whom specialize in psychology or neuroscience, who went on a week-long camping trip to discuss how technology affects the way we behave and think. To say that technology can have an adverse effect on how we process thought is grossly oversimplifying the issue. But the piece raises a question many have asked in the past: Are we letting technology ruin our ability to think?

Tags: , , , ,

Human memory is tricky, to say the least. It’s an ever-changing cloud of imperfect recollections, distortions and outright fabrications. It’s a tag cloud full of joys, torments and minutia. And while savants and mnemonists can sometimes exhibit startling displays of memory, there is no such thing as total recall.

Following a 2005 study published in the journal Neurocase, however, the media had a field day with Jill Price, a California woman with an amazing capacity for personal memory. Give her a name and she can tell you exactly where and when she spoke to that person last and what the subject was. Throw out a date and she can link it to plane crashes, presidential elections and episodes of “Dallas.”

Tags: , ,

There’s something deeply satisfying about the field of neuroscience taking a roundhouse to the face from a professor of geriatric medicine who hails from the same town as Morrissey.

The aforementioned Raymond Tallis has been on a rampage lately. Most recently he’s pointed out in an article in New Scientist the fallacious nature of applying something as calculating as science to explain something as subjective as human consciousness. Tallis sides with a small and much bullied group that don’t believe that consciousness is necessarily generated within the brain. As such, neuroscience isn’t equipped to investigate what it is that accounts for the human sense of self.

Tags: , ,

Grasping: Buddhism has decried it as the source of all human suffering for millennia while the West built an entire culture around it. We want more money. We want more life. We live our self-centered lives with the demon of impermanence breathing down our neck. The idea that we might feel better if we forgot about ourselves for a little bit should seem like a no-brainer.

Tags: , , , , ,

Last fall I was blind, if only for an hour. I had gone to “Dialog in the Dark,” a performance that gives you a brief but lasting glimpse of what life might be like without your eyes. It’s so dark in the exhibition space that you can have your eyes wide open and not see your hand in front of your face. After the performance, I stepped into the light, and my brain started processing all that assaulting visual information lickety-split. Thanks, brain.

Sometimes, though, your brain has to learn how to see. It’s a weird thought, like learning how to breathe, but that’s the deal for formerly blind people whose sight is restored. How does your gray matter accomplish this monumental task? A bunch of MIT neurophysicists have tried to figure it out. For their experiment, they found three participants ranging in age from 3 to 29 who had regained their sight.

Tags: , , , , ,

I find that much of what I read regarding neuroscience stirs the unsettling notion that the human experience itself is little more than an absurd dream, a strange byproduct of evolution. Canadian author R. Scott Bakker ruminates on these topics, weaving imagined worlds with philosophic discourse and neurological research. In his book “Neuropath,” he refers to something he calls “the semantic apocalypse.” This catastrophe occurs when science shines enough light on the human condition for reason to fail.

Tags: , , ,

Recent Postings by Category