Posts Tagged: ‘copyright’
I don’t know if you’ve noticed but the Internet went kind of crazy today. Crazier than usual. On a normal day, crazy means a flame war or two (thousand), a hundred or so cat videos and more content than you can shake a stick at. But today, people and companies across the Internet have tweeted, blogged, posted on Facebook and used every other means to get word out about some controversial legislation under discussion in the U.S. government. The two main targets have been SOPA and PIPA. Here’s a quick rundown on what these are and what they could mean to you if they were passed into law.
White House Sends Mixed Messages About Online Privacy
by Jonathan Strickland | March 17, 2011
It seems like every other day I write or talk about privacy concerns in relation to the Internet. This week, a pair of stories about how the United States government values online privacy broke and they don’t exactly mesh together. It seems that, at least on the surface, the concern leans more toward corporations than citizens. The more cynical among us might say that this is just the U.S. government following the same course that was set years ago, in which giant corporations influence — or perhaps even dictate — policy.
Consider the content spectrum on the Internet. On one side, you have purely original content, generated by the webmaster or by those who work for him/her. On the other, you have user-generated content. With this model, the Web site is really just a forum in which users can post their own content for the enjoyment of other users. Most Web sites fall somewhere between the two extremes. Justin.tv, a site that allows users to stream video over the Web, slants more toward the user-generated model than the other. That’s what has caused the UFC to take notice.
Peer-to-peer networks have a nasty stigma. The technology is perfectly legal — it’s an efficient and flexible way to distribute data across networks. But that’s also why software, music, movie and television pirates like it so much. Using peer-to-peer connections, it’s easy to download or distribute content on a wide scale.
U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup ruled on Friday that Psystar was guilty of copyright infringement against Apple, according to Natalie Weinstein of CNET. The whole case revolves around Apple’s Mac operating system. Unlike Windows or Linux, which you can install on whatever hardware you like, Apple only wants the Mac OS to belong to Apple computers.
That hasn’t stopped hundreds of enterprising hackers from building their own machines and installing Mac OS X. But because Apple designed the operating system with a particular hardware and BIOS configuration in mind, the OS doesn’t always work properly on an unauthorized machine. And the process of installing a non-native operating system is complicated and can require a lot of troubleshooting — it’s not something the computer novice should attempt.
That’s where Psystar stepped in. The fact that hackintoshes (the common name for a PC running the Mac OS) exist shows that people want computers running the Mac OS but they don’t want an actual Apple computer. Maybe they don’t like Apple’s product design, or perhaps they feel that the Mac line of computers is too expensive. In 2008, Psystar began to sell PCs running the Mac operating system. The company took care of the tricky process of installing the OS on non-Apple hardware (though Psystar also explained that the computer might not always behave as it should).
TV Cables and Creative Commons – TechStuff Podcast Roundup
by Jonathan Strickland | October 2, 2009
Hey there! Today, I’m writing to you from deep inside a top secret location. By top secret, I mean my couch at home. And by deep inside, I mean I’m currently huddled under a massive blanket with only my arms poking out to type this. It turns out I have the flu. While I entertained the thought of coming in to work anyway, my coworkers tend to appreciate it if sick people stay home rather than infect the whole office. Besides, the last senior writer to come in sick vanished somewhat mysteriously.
But never fear, TechStuff fans — even though I may be ravaged by the flu, the show must go on. That’s why I’m here to tell you about two of our latest episodes of TechStuff. I think we have a couple of real gems this week. And for those of you who haven’t been listening, go and download a few episodes or listen to them here on our streaming podcast player.
On Monday, Chris and I talked about television cables. We explain the different kinds of cables you’d use to hook up your various pieces of equipment to your television. Which ones are the best? Is an HDMI cable better than S-video? Why are composite video cables red, white and yellow while component video cables are red, blue and green? Note: that last one was a trick question. For people overwhelmed by the choices they face when it comes time to set up a home theater system, this episode can help you narrow down your choices. There’s more under the cut.
Copyright strictly prohibits people from using and benefitting from other people’s creative work, while creative commons is a bit more flexible. Tune in as Jonathan and Chris discuss copyright and creative commons in this podcast from HowStuffWorks.com.
Back in July, I blogged about how the co-founders of the VoIP service Skype, Niklas Zennstrom and Janus Friis, accused eBay of violating its licensing agreement regarding Skype’s underlying technology. To sum up: the co-founders sold the company called Skype to eBay but retained the copyright on the technology that Skype uses to function. While eBay owns Skype, it has to license the technology from the co-founders. Zennstrom and Friis say that eBay has violated the terms of that license and have pursued legal action in British courts.
Now the New York Times reports that the co-founders have expanded the battle to the United States. Yesterday, Zennstrom and Friis filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in the District Court of Northern California.
I imagine the Skype team at eBay has a large supply of antacids on hand right now. Since day one of eBay’s acquisition of Skype, tech journalists have questioned the purchase. Originally, eBay had hoped to incorporate Skype’s technology in its auction process. Ideally, potential customers could talk with people offering up items for sale. But eBay never found a way to integrate Skype into its architecture.
Now eBay is attempting to sell off a significant percentage of ownership of Skype to a group of private investors. But it turns out that people looking to buy a company usually don’t like to complete a purchase in the middle of legal issues. A lawsuit could complicate matters and put the sale on hold indefinitely.
Last week, I wrote about the verdict in The Pirate Bay case in Sweden. This week, it turns out that judge Thomas Norström may have connections to a few organizations that might call into question his objectivity. The Register reports that there is evidence to link the judge to the Swedish Copyright Association and the Swedish Association for the Protection of Industrial Property. Both of these organizations lobby for stronger copyright protection laws.
In case you forgot, the guilty verdict against The Pirate Bay was for a charge saying the company had assisted in copyright infringement. The Swedish court sentenced the four founders to a year in prison and fined them $3.59 million U.S. in damages. That might seem like a pretty severe punishment. Could the severity be linked to the judge’s association with the copyright protection organizations?
At least one lawyer for the four founders has argued that the judge’s involvement with the copyright lobbies calls for a retrial of the case.
According to the Washington Post, a Swedish court has pronounced the four founders of The Pirate Bay guilty on charges of assisting copyright infringement. The court has ordered the four to pay damages to companies like Warner Bros. and Sony to the tune of $3.59 million U.S.
Recent Postings by Category
BrainStuff
- Thank You and Best Wishes to Marshall Brain
- Contest – Design a $300 house and win $25,000
- How the Philtrum works – the place under your nose where your face comes together
The Coolest Stuff on the Planet
Keep Asking
- Why can a 5 foot 8 inch man dunk a basketball on a 10 foot rim while some people of taller stature can’t?
- What happens to our sun once it runs out of fuel?
- How do we know the age of the universe?
Stuff Mom Never Told You
- Who invented the Christmas card?
- How the Kinsey Report Fueled Whiskey Sales
- How to Get Your Wedding Announcement into The New York Times
Stuff to Blow Your Mind
- Blow Your Mind: In the Lair of the Rat King
- Mandala: Memory Palace, Inception and Simulated Worlds
- Virgin Galactic: $200,000 Ticket to Ride
Stuff You Should Know
- The Southern Death Cult, the Maya and Georgia
- Deformed Baby Spider Brains
- Amazing Medical Conditions: Maple Syrup Urine Disorder
The Stuff of Genius
CarStuff
- Was Chrysler’s “It’s Halftime in America” Super Bowl commercial a little too political?
- Why is NASA studying car safety?
- Tips for in-car Navigation Systems
How-to Stuff
- How to Make the Most of a Gallery Crawl (When You’re on a Shoestring Budget)
- How to Swim with Dolphins (When Deep Water Terrifies You)
- How to Cure a Homemade Cookie Craving Without Turning on the Oven
PopStuff
- PopStuff Show Notes: Episode 40: Did movies ruin love?
- PopStuff Show Notes: Episode 39: Urban Legends
- PopStuff Show Notes: Episode 38: Defending Disney Princesses?
Stuff They Don't Want You To Know
Stuff to Change the World
- Who will own the Arctic?
- Obesity: The New Global Crisis
- Bill Gates Makes For A Pretty Decent Cartoon
Stuff You Missed in History Class
- Butch Cassidy: Should we read between the lines?
- Are we rooting for D.B. Cooper?
- Party Time: A Look at Unconventional Politics

