TechStuff
Navigate today's cutting-edge technology with the gurus from HowStuffWorks.
BlueBeat Forced to Stop Selling Beatles’ Catalog
by Chris Pollette | November 6, 2009
A California company called BlueBeat has been selling MP3 tracks for 25 cents each and streaming them for free. Online music retail is pretty much old news, though the price point is low enough to attract attention. But as Macworld’s Jonathan Seff wrote, the site is also selling the Beatles’ catalog — without a license. Seff pointed out that the site’s terms of use say that if users feel that the music posted to the site has been uploaded in violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, then they can contact the people running the site to have it removed.
There’s also a warning, Seff said, that false accusations can be penalized under the DMCA.
Well, apparently EMI, the company that owns the rights to the Beatles’ catalog, filed a lawsuit for copyright infringement and had a temporary restraining order granted to stop the site from continuing its business. When I checked a few moments ago, the site was completely unavailable.
Nate Anderson at Ars Technica wrote yesterday that the company that runs BlueBeat.com, Media Rights Technologies, is claiming that what the site is doing is completely legit. Why? Because it owns the copyright to the music it sells. Anderson wrote that, in a reply to Recording Industry Association of America general counsel Steven Marks, Media Rights Technologies CEO Hank Risan said he is the author of the music files, which were created using a process called psycho-acoustic simulation. The company has filed for copyright protection on the songs.
MRT said, in a response to the lawsuit, that the company doesn’t feel the plaintiff will succeed because the two recordings are completely different. You see, according to U.S. copyright law, if there’s a new recording of a song featuring different sounds, then that’s considered a new work.
Anderson said that MRT is taking the Beatles’ (and other artists’) tracks and adding video content to them that can only be seen with the company’s proprietary player. Thus, according to the company, these are new audio-visual works.
I don’t think that MRT will succeed in this case. And I’m far from the only one. I suppose we’ll see.
For more on MP3s and related tech, take a look at these articles:
How MP3 Files Work
How Streaming Video and Audio Work
How iTunes Works
-
The psycho part I get. It’s the acoustic simulation part that confuses me.
Recent Postings by Category
BrainStuff
- Interesting Reading #414 – The tiniest computer, hearts really can break, family pays $5,000 per year for connections, New font saves ink and much more…
- Public Service Announcement – Soft drinks nearly double your chances of pancreatic cancer
- Amazing – Going inside the Giant Crystal Cave
FanStuff
- What’s art — and what’s groundbreaking — in video games?
- Ursula K. Le Guin vs. Google Books: Round Two
- “Lost,” “Fringe” and That Whole Alternate Universe Thing
How-to Stuff
- How to Take a Road Trip, Abraham Lincoln-Style
- How to Explain Love in the Least Romantic Way Possible
- How to Quiet a Barking Dog
ScienceStuff
- Space Music Vol. 8: Sun Ra and Afrofuturism
- Stuff from the Science Lab Roundup: Space Eats and Grow Houses
- Why does time fly as you get older?
Stuff You Should Know
The Coolest Stuff on the Planet
High Speed Stuff
- The Toyota Recall: Where can you get the latest information?
- What is Toyota doing to fix its gas pedal problem?
- High Speed Stuff Wrap-up: Automotive Pet Peeves and Polar Vehicles
Keep Asking
- How does an airbrush work?
- Is the Internet free? If you want to make a website, will it cost you to put it online?
- If you look at a piece of glass from an angle, why does it have a bluish or green tint?
Stuff You Missed in History Class
- Last Week in History Podcasts: Battle Horses and Black Moses
- The Wonderful Adventures of the Nurse We Forgot
- Black History Month on HowStuffWorks



2 Comments