FanStuff
HowStuffWorks gets serious about having fun.
A Different Take on Sex and Vampires: Vampire as Gay Boyfriend
by Tracy V. Wilson | October 15, 2009

Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart in "The Twilight Saga: New Moon." Does this look safe to you? (Photo by Kimberley French, © 2009 Summit Entertainment. All Rights Reserved)
A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about the connection between sex and vampires. This morning, I ran across a link to a different take on the topic in Salon’s Broadsheet blog. There, Tracy Clark-Flory writes about an article in Esquire that equates vampires with gay men. “Vampires have overwhelmed pop culture,” says Stephen Marche, “because young straight women want to have sex with gay men.”
Regardless of whether that’s an accurate assessment of the desires of young straight women, I can see how someone could make a connection between straight vampires and gay men. But, beyond the obvious metaphors, it mostly boils down to stereotypes rather than to reality. Many — but not all — of today’s male vampires seem to be cut from the same mold, with sculpted eyebrows, impressive wardrobes, carefully groomed hair and a hidden (or heavy-handed) sensitive side. In other words, “vampire” seems to have become another word for “metrosexual.” (TechStuff’s Jonathan Strickland blames this trend on Anne Rice novels and Hot Topic.)
But then, Marche’s argument takes another turn: Women, he writes, are looking for “Sex that’s dangerous and safe at the same time, risky but comfortable, gooey and violent but also traditional and loving.” And that’s where he loses me. The vampire sex scenes in books, movies or film that immediately come to mind are definitely dangerous and not at all safe. On “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” Angel’s one encounter with Buffy turns him into the soulless demon Angelus, who kills Buffy’s friends and tortures her Watcher. Later on, Spike and Buffy literally tear the house down in an increasingly confrontational sexual relationship. ["Breaking Dawn" spoiler incoming.] When Edward and Bella consummate their marriage, Bella winds up covered in bruises, and Edward refuses to touch her again. Plus, Bella gets pregnant with a half-vampire child that kills her during delivery. I haven’t watched enough of “True Blood” yet to comment on Bill Compton’s relationship with Sookie Stackhouse, but the other vampire liaisons I’ve seen on the show so far have been heavy on the violence and light on the safety.
Maybe the sex is safer in “The Vampire Diaries” — if there is any — but since I haven’t watched it, I don’t know.
How about you — can you think of any vampire relationships that really are both safe and dangerous?
More on it at HowStuffWorks.com:
Why is it so difficult to separate “vampire” from “sex”?
How Vampires Work
How Sex Works
How Women Work
How Men Work
-
IMO, it seems less about having sex with gay men or metrosexual men, and more about having sex with the tamed bad boy. Wait- I don’t know, because the “sex with vampires” seems to be completely different when it’s human girls(women) having sex with vampires, versus vampires having sex with vampires. The whole girl-falling-in-love-with-noble-vampire business sort of makes me wretch on the Bella front, because of the life-sacrificing stuff, but it didn’t bother me with Buffy, because she killed the vamps when they got bad. Bella actually gives up her human life so that she can have sex with Edward. Whether the sex is “safe” or not seems immaterial, since he won’t have sex with her until they’re married, and she won’t marry him until he agrees to turn her. I don’t know what’s tamer than a bloodsucker who won’t put out unless she gotta ring on it.
True Blood shows both; Sookie and Bill’s sex is sometimes dirty and dangerous (and sometimes gross- literally in the dirt? That’s gonna lead to an infection) and sometimes loving. However, the wilder vamps who drink human blood and bang “fangbangers” are portrayed as violent and sadistic.
It’s been a long time- did Anne Rice have any heterosexual human/vamp parings? -
I’m not sure about the ’safe’ part, but I totally understand the metro part. Gay men and vampires are both rather unattainable to women. It comes back to wanting what you can’t/shouldn’t have. Sometimes we choose to lust after what we cannot have because we know that if we could actually have it, it would cause problems/be dangerous. We submerge ourselves in the longing. The intense passion behind longing can go on indefinitely, while the pleasure in having often diminishes with time.
Recent Postings by Category
BrainStuff
- Interesting Reading #414 – The tiniest computer, hearts really can break, family pays $5,000 per year for connections, New font saves ink and much more…
- Public Service Announcement – Soft drinks nearly double your chances of pancreatic cancer
- Amazing – Going inside the Giant Crystal Cave
FanStuff
- What’s art — and what’s groundbreaking — in video games?
- Ursula K. Le Guin vs. Google Books: Round Two
- “Lost,” “Fringe” and That Whole Alternate Universe Thing
How-to Stuff
- How to Take a Road Trip, Abraham Lincoln-Style
- How to Explain Love in the Least Romantic Way Possible
- How to Quiet a Barking Dog
ScienceStuff
- Space Music Vol. 8: Sun Ra and Afrofuturism
- Stuff from the Science Lab Roundup: Space Eats and Grow Houses
- Why does time fly as you get older?
Stuff You Should Know
The Coolest Stuff on the Planet
High Speed Stuff
- The Toyota Recall: Where can you get the latest information?
- What is Toyota doing to fix its gas pedal problem?
- High Speed Stuff Wrap-up: Automotive Pet Peeves and Polar Vehicles
Keep Asking
- How does an airbrush work?
- Is the Internet free? If you want to make a website, will it cost you to put it online?
- If you look at a piece of glass from an angle, why does it have a bluish or green tint?
Stuff You Missed in History Class
- Last Week in History Podcasts: Battle Horses and Black Moses
- The Wonderful Adventures of the Nurse We Forgot
- Black History Month on HowStuffWorks



3 Comments