FanStuff
HowStuffWorks gets serious about having fun.

Category RSS Feed

A Different Take on Sex and Vampires: Vampire as Gay Boyfriend

by Tracy V. Wilson |

3 Comments | Add Comment

 

Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart in "The Twilight Saga: New Moon." Does this look safe to you? (Photo by Kimberley French, © 2009 Summit Entertainment. All Rights Reserved)

Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart in "The Twilight Saga: New Moon." Does this look safe to you? (Photo by Kimberley French, © 2009 Summit Entertainment. All Rights Reserved)

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about the connection between sex and vampires. This morning, I ran across a link to a different take on the topic in Salon’s Broadsheet blog. There, Tracy Clark-Flory writes about an article in Esquire that equates vampires with gay men. “Vampires have overwhelmed pop culture,” says Stephen Marche, “because young straight women want to have sex with gay men.”

Regardless of whether that’s an accurate assessment of the desires of young straight women, I can see how someone could make a connection between straight vampires and gay men. But, beyond the obvious metaphors, it mostly boils down to stereotypes rather than to reality. Many — but not all — of today’s male vampires seem to be cut from the same mold, with sculpted eyebrows, impressive wardrobes, carefully groomed hair and a hidden (or heavy-handed) sensitive side. In other words, “vampire” seems to have become another word for “metrosexual.” (TechStuff’s Jonathan Strickland blames this trend on Anne Rice novels and Hot Topic.)

But then, Marche’s argument takes another turn: Women, he writes, are looking for “Sex that’s dangerous and safe at the same time, risky but comfortable, gooey and violent but also traditional and loving.” And that’s where he loses me. The vampire sex scenes in books, movies or film that immediately come to mind are definitely dangerous and not at all safe. On “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” Angel’s one encounter with Buffy turns him into the soulless demon Angelus, who kills Buffy’s friends and tortures her Watcher. Later on, Spike and Buffy literally tear the house down in an increasingly confrontational sexual relationship. ["Breaking Dawn" spoiler incoming.] When Edward and Bella consummate their marriage, Bella winds up covered in bruises, and Edward refuses to touch her again. Plus, Bella gets pregnant with a half-vampire child that kills her during delivery. I haven’t watched enough of “True Blood” yet to comment on Bill Compton’s relationship with Sookie Stackhouse, but the other vampire liaisons I’ve seen on the show so far have been heavy on the violence and light on the safety.

Maybe the sex is safer in “The Vampire Diaries” — if there is any — but since I haven’t watched it, I don’t know.

How about you — can you think of any vampire relationships that really are both safe and dangerous?

More on it at HowStuffWorks.com:
Why is it so difficult to separate “vampire” from “sex”?
How Vampires Work
How Sex Works
How Women Work
How Men Work

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

3 Comments

  • Pigri says:

    IMO, it seems less about having sex with gay men or metrosexual men, and more about having sex with the tamed bad boy. Wait- I don’t know, because the “sex with vampires” seems to be completely different when it’s human girls(women) having sex with vampires, versus vampires having sex with vampires. The whole girl-falling-in-love-with-noble-vampire business sort of makes me wretch on the Bella front, because of the life-sacrificing stuff, but it didn’t bother me with Buffy, because she killed the vamps when they got bad. Bella actually gives up her human life so that she can have sex with Edward. Whether the sex is “safe” or not seems immaterial, since he won’t have sex with her until they’re married, and she won’t marry him until he agrees to turn her. I don’t know what’s tamer than a bloodsucker who won’t put out unless she gotta ring on it.
    True Blood shows both; Sookie and Bill’s sex is sometimes dirty and dangerous (and sometimes gross- literally in the dirt? That’s gonna lead to an infection) and sometimes loving. However, the wilder vamps who drink human blood and bang “fangbangers” are portrayed as violent and sadistic.
    It’s been a long time- did Anne Rice have any heterosexual human/vamp parings?

  • I’m not sure about the ’safe’ part, but I totally understand the metro part. Gay men and vampires are both rather unattainable to women. It comes back to wanting what you can’t/shouldn’t have. Sometimes we choose to lust after what we cannot have because we know that if we could actually have it, it would cause problems/be dangerous. We submerge ourselves in the longing. The intense passion behind longing can go on indefinitely, while the pleasure in having often diminishes with time.

  • Tracy V. Wilson says:

    Pigri: My only experience with Anne Rice is the “Interview with the Vampire” film, so I have no idea.

    Brianna: Bad Boy + Unattainable definitely seems like a way more believable explanation of why vampires are so popular among teens especially.

Add your comment

Facebook Users

or Non-Facebook Users

Please read our comment policy »

We love thoughtful responses and lively debates in our comment threads, but please be polite and keep your comments on topic. Spam, trolling, profanity, threats, personal attacks or comments that are generally considered not safe for work will be deleted. For more information please see our Visitor Agreement

Recent Postings by Category